Tuesday, December 22, 2009


ᑯᕕᐊᓇᒃ ᐃᓄᕕᐊ Kuvianak Inovia (Inuktitut)
Juullimi ukiortaasamilu pilluaritsi (Greenlandic)
Ya'at'eeh Keshmish (Dine/Navaho)
I'Taamomohkatoyiiksistsikomi
(Blackfoot)
Hoesenestotse & Aa'eEmona'e (Cheyenne)
Mitho Makosi Kesikansi
(Cree)
Hisgusgitxwsim Ha'niisgats Christ ganhl Ama Sii K'uuhl!
(Gitxsan)
Gayayr Nwel (Métis/Michif)
Xristos Khuwdziti kax sh kaxtoolxetl (Tlingit)
Wli Nuelewi (Mi'kmaq)
Me7 le7 es es w7ec-emp ne xyum te sitqt ell ne petpénye (Shuswap/Secwépemctsin)
Mélí Kelesmés (Sto:lo/Halq'emeylem)
Zoo dungwel & Soocho nohdzi doghel (Carrier)
圣诞快乐 shèng dàn kuài lè (Chinese)
Joyeux Noël (French)
Fröhliche Weihnachten (German)
Buon Natale (Italian)
Selamat hari natal (bahasa Malay)
Meri Kirihimete (Maori)
C Pождеством Xристовом S rojdestvom Kristovom (Russian)
Nollaig chridheil (Scots Gaelic)
QISmaS botIvjaj 'ej DIS chu' botIvjaj (Klingon)

MERRY CHRISTMAS
HAPPY NEW YEAR

Monday, November 30, 2009



It has been awhile since I last made an entry into this blog. The issue of climate change has become one of extreme importance. The Copenhagen Conference needs to succeed in setting some real topics. The official web-site for the conference is for those who are interested. The news from the Arctic continues to be alarming. Although the winter of 2008-2009 was back to more usual levels of cold, this past summer has seen what may well be the last of the multi-year ice in the Beaufort Sea. This means only thinner annual ice will remain each winter and may well completely melt during future summers. The habitats of polar bears, walrus, seals and other marine mammals in the High Arctic are significantly under threat. The Northwest Passage was completely ice-free in 2007 for the first time in history. Greenland glacial melt is continuing to increase threatening rising sea levels and interference with the Gulf Stream warming northwest Europe. Inuit hunters and elders are continuing to sound the alarm. The people of Nunaat [Inuit land and ice all around the Arctic] are trying to get us all to listen. The Inuit Circumpolar Conference released the following in April of 2009:

A Circumpolar Inuit Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic

We, the Inuit of Inuit Nunaat, declare as follows:
1. Inuit and the Arctic
1.1 Inuit live in the Arctic. Inuit live in the vast, circumpolar region of land, sea and ice known as the Arctic. We depend on the marine and terrestrial plants and animals supported by the coastal zones of the Arctic Ocean, the tundra and the sea ice. The Arctic is our home.
1.2 Inuit have been living in the Arctic from time immemorial. From time immemorial, Inuit have been living in the Arctic. Our home in the circumpolar world, Inuit Nunaat, stretches from Greenland to Canada, Alaska and the coastal regions of Chukotka, Russia. Our use and occupation of Arctic lands and waters pre-dates recorded history. Our unique knowledge, experience of the Arctic, and language are the foundation of our way of life and culture.
1.3 Inuit are a people. Though Inuit live across a far-reaching circumpolar region, we are united as a single people. Our sense of unity is fostered and celebrated by the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC), which represents the Inuit of Denmark/Greenland, Canada, USA and Russia. As a people, we enjoy the rights of all peoples. These include the rights recognized in and by various international instruments and institutions, such as the Charter of the United Nations; the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action; the Human Rights Council; the Arctic Council; and the Organization of American States.
1.4 Inuit are an indigenous people. Inuit are an indigenous people with the rights and responsibilities of all indigenous peoples. These include the rights recognized in and by international legal and political instruments and bodies, such as the recommendations of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and others.
Central to our rights as a people is the right to self-determination. It is our right to freely determine our political status, freely pursue our economic, social, cultural and linguistic development, and freely dispose of our natural wealth and resources. States are obligated to respect and promote the realization of our right to self-determination. (See, for example, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR], Art. 1.)
Our rights as an indigenous people include the following rights recognized in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), all of which are relevant to sovereignty and sovereign rights in the Arctic: the right to self-determination, to freely determine our political status and to freely pursue our economic, social and cultural, including linguistic, development (Art. 3); the right to internal autonomy or self-government (Art. 4); the right to recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with states (Art. 37); the right to maintain and strengthen our distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining the right to participate fully in the political, economic, social and cultural life of states (Art. 5); the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect our rights and to maintain and develop our own indigenous decision-making institutions (Art. 18); the right to own, use, develop and control our lands, territories and resources and the right to ensure that no project affecting our lands, territories or resources will proceed without our free and informed consent (Art. 25-32); the right to peace and security (Art. 7); and the right to conservation and protection of our environment (Art. 29).
1.5 Inuit are an indigenous people of the Arctic. Our status, rights and responsibilities as a people among the peoples of the world, and as an indigenous people, are exercised within the unique geographic, environmental, cultural and political context of the Arctic. This has been acknowledged in the eight-nation Arctic Council, which provides a direct, participatory role for Inuit through the permanent participant status accorded the Inuit Circumpolar Council (Art. 2).
1.6 Inuit are citizens of Arctic states. As citizens of Arctic states (Denmark, Canada, USA and Russia), we have the rights and responsibilities afforded all citizens under the constitutions, laws, policies and public sector programs of these states. These rights and responsibilities do not diminish the rights and responsibilities of Inuit as a people under international law.
1.7 Inuit are indigenous citizens of Arctic states. As an indigenous people within Arctic states, we have the rights and responsibilities afforded all indigenous peoples under the constitutions, laws, policies and public sector programs of these states. These rights and responsibilities do not diminish the rights and responsibilities of Inuit as a people under international law.
1.8 Inuit are indigenous citizens of each of the major political subunits of Arctic states (states, provinces, territories and regions). As an indigenous people within Arctic states, provinces, territories, regions or other political subunits, we have the rights and responsibilities afforded all indigenous peoples under the constitutions, laws, policies and public sector programs of these subunits. These rights and responsibilities do not diminish the rights and responsibilities of Inuit as a people under international law.
2. The Evolving Nature of Sovereignty in the Arctic
2.1 “Sovereignty” is a term that has often been used to refer to the absolute and independent authority of a community or nation both internally and externally. Sovereignty is a contested concept, however, and does not have a fixed meaning. Old ideas of sovereignty are breaking down as different governance models, such as the European Union, evolve. Sovereignties overlap and are frequently divided within federations in creative ways to recognize the right of peoples. For Inuit living within the states of Russia, Canada, the USA and Denmark/Greenland, issues of sovereignty and sovereign rights must be examined and assessed in the context of our long history of struggle to gain recognition and respect as an Arctic indigenous people having the right to exercise self-determination over our lives, territories, cultures and languages.
2.2 Recognition and respect for our right to self-determination is developing at varying paces and in various forms in the Arctic states in which we live. Following a referendum in November 2008, the areas of self-government in Greenland will expand greatly and, among other things, Greenlandic (Kalaallisut) will become Greenland’s sole official language. In Canada, four land claims agreements are some of the key building blocks of Inuit rights; while there are conflicts over the implementation of these agreements, they remain of vital relevance to matters of self-determination and of sovereignty and sovereign rights. In Alaska, much work is needed to clarify and implement the rights recognized in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). In particular, subsistence hunting and self-government rights need to be fully respected and accommodated, and issues impeding their enjoyment and implementation need to be addressed and resolved. And in Chukotka, Russia, a very limited number of administrative processes have begun to secure recognition of Inuit rights. These developments will provide a foundation on which to construct future, creative governance arrangements tailored to diverse circumstances in states, regions and communities.
2.3 In exercising our right to self-determination in the circumpolar Arctic, we continue to develop innovative and creative jurisdictional arrangements that will appropriately balance our rights and responsibilities as an indigenous people, the rights and responsibilities we share with other peoples who live among us, and the rights and responsibilities of states. In seeking to exercise our rights in the Arctic, we continue to promote compromise and harmony with and among our neighbours.
2.4 International and other instruments increasingly recognize the rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination and representation in intergovernmental matters, and are evolving beyond issues of internal governance to external relations. (See, for example: ICCPR, Art. 1; UNDRIP, Art. 3; Draft Nordic Saami Convention, Art. 17, 19; Nunavut Land Claims Agreement, Art. 5.9).
2.5 Inuit are permanent participants at the Arctic Council with a direct and meaningful seat at discussion and negotiating tables (See 1997 Ottawa Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council).
2.6 In spite of a recognition by the five coastal Arctic states (Norway, Denmark, Canada, USA and Russia) of the need to use international mechanisms and international law to resolve sovereignty disputes (see 2008 Ilulissat Declaration), these states, in their discussions of Arctic sovereignty, have not referenced existing international instruments that promote and protect the rights of indigenous peoples. They have also neglected to include Inuit in Arctic sovereignty discussions in a manner comparable to Arctic Council deliberations.
3. Inuit, the Arctic and Sovereignty: Looking Forward
The foundations of action
3.1 The actions of Arctic peoples and states, the interactions between them, and the conduct of international relations must be anchored in the rule of law.
3.2 The actions of Arctic peoples and states, the interactions between them, and the conduct of international relations must give primary respect to the need for global environmental security, the need for peaceful resolution of disputes, and the inextricable linkages between issues of sovereignty and sovereign rights in the Arctic and issues of self-determination.
Inuit as active partners
3.3 The inextricable linkages between issues of sovereignty and sovereign rights in the Arctic and Inuit self-determination and other rights require states to accept the presence and role of Inuit as partners in the conduct of international relations in the Arctic.
3.4 A variety of other factors, ranging from unique Inuit knowledge of Arctic ecosystems to the need for appropriate emphasis on sustainability in the weighing of resource development proposals, provide practical advantages to conducting international relations in the Arctic in partnership with Inuit.
3.5 Inuit consent, expertise and perspectives are critical to progress on international issues involving the Arctic, such as global environmental security, sustainable development, militarization, commercial fishing, shipping, human health, and economic and social development.
3.6 As states increasingly focus on the Arctic and its resources, and as climate change continues to create easier access to the Arctic, Inuit inclusion as active partners is central to all national and international deliberations on Arctic sovereignty and related questions, such as who owns the Arctic, who has the right to traverse the Arctic, who has the right to develop the Arctic, and who will be responsible for the social and environmental impacts increasingly facing the Arctic. We have unique knowledge and experience to bring to these deliberations. The inclusion of Inuit as active partners in all future deliberations on Arctic sovereignty will benefit both the Inuit community and the international community.
3.7 The extensive involvement of Inuit in global, trans-national and indigenous politics requires the building of new partnerships with states for the protection and promotion of indigenous economies, cultures and traditions. Partnerships must acknowledge that industrial development of the natural resource wealth of the Arctic can proceed only insofar as it enhances the economic and social well-being of Inuit and safeguards our environmental security.
The need for global cooperation
3.8 There is a pressing need for enhanced international exchange and cooperation in relation to the Arctic, particularly in relation to the dynamics and impacts of climate change and sustainable economic and social development. Regional institutions that draw together Arctic states, states from outside the Arctic, and representatives of Arctic indigenous peoples can provide useful mechanisms for international exchange and cooperation.
3.9 The pursuit of global environmental security requires a coordinated global approach to the challenges of climate change, a rigorous plan to arrest the growth in human-generated carbon emissions, and a far-reaching program of adaptation to climate change in Arctic regions and communities.
3.10 The magnitude of the climate change problem dictates that Arctic states and their peoples fully participate in international efforts aimed at arresting and reversing levels of greenhouse gas emissions and enter into international protocols and treaties. These international efforts, protocols and treaties cannot be successful without the full participation and cooperation of indigenous peoples.
Healthy Arctic communities
3.11 In the pursuit of economic opportunities in a warming Arctic, states must act so as to: (1) put economic activity on a sustainable footing; (2) avoid harmful resource exploitation; (3) achieve standards of living for Inuit that meet national and international norms and minimums; and (4) deflect sudden and far-reaching demographic shifts that would overwhelm and marginalize indigenous peoples where we are rooted and have endured.
3.12 The foundation, projection and enjoyment of Arctic sovereignty and sovereign rights all require healthy and sustainable communities in the Arctic. In this sense, “sovereignty begins at home.”
Building on today’s mechanisms for the future
3.13 We will exercise our rights of self-determination in the Arctic by building on institutions such as the Inuit Circumpolar Council and the Arctic Council, the Arctic-specific features of international instruments, such as the ice-covered-waters provision of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the Arctic-related work of international mechanisms, such as the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the office of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples, and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
4. A Circumpolar Inuit Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic
4.1 At the first Inuit Leaders’ Summit, 6-7 November 2008, in Kuujjuaq, Nunavik, Canada, Inuit leaders from Greenland, Canada and Alaska gathered to address Arctic sovereignty. On 7 November, International Inuit Day, we expressed unity in our concerns over Arctic sovereignty deliberations, examined the options for addressing these concerns, and strongly committed to developing a formal declaration on Arctic sovereignty. We also noted that the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration on Arctic sovereignty by ministers representing the five coastal Arctic states did not go far enough in affirming the rights Inuit have gained through international law, land claims and self-government processes.
4.2 The conduct of international relations in the Arctic and the resolution of international disputes in the Arctic are not the sole preserve of Arctic states or other states; they are also within the purview of the Arctic’s indigenous peoples. The development of international institutions in the Arctic, such as multi-level governance systems and indigenous peoples’ organizations, must transcend Arctic states’ agendas on sovereignty and sovereign rights and the traditional monopoly claimed by states in the area of foreign affairs.
4.3 Issues of sovereignty and sovereign rights in the Arctic have become inextricably linked to issues of self-determination in the Arctic. Inuit and Arctic states must, therefore, work together closely and constructively to chart the future of the Arctic.
We, the Inuit of Inuit Nunaat, are committed to this Declaration and to working with Arctic states and others to build partnerships in which the rights, roles and responsibilities of Inuit are fully recognized
and accommodated.

Tuesday, April 04, 2006


IT'S SPRING - TIME FOR A BRIGHTER IMAGE!!!! The old blogger template was a little too dark. This picture is of the Sylvia Grennell River near Iqaluit, Nunavut. It doesn't quite look like that this early in the year - this was taken in early July. But spring is a state of mind as much as a season.

Images of spring in Victoria, British Columbia and Nunavut.




Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Friday, March 10, 2006

If you are interested in looking at more blogs on Nunavut, please go to Nunavut Blogs at http://kiggavik.typepad.com/nunavut_blogs/. I'd like to link this site to my blog, but am not sure how!

Thursday, March 02, 2006





Although images of the Canadian Arctic are central to Canada’s vision of itself as “the true North strong and free”, the rapid process of colonization in relation to Canada’s land and sea mass north of the 60th parallel has gone almost completely unnoticed by most Canadian citizens clustered along the southern US/Canada border. The creation of the territory of Nunavut in 1999 triggered some attention, but few Canadians have ever traveled more than a few hundred miles away from the 49th parallel. Nunavut and the Arctic remain remote and exotic locations on the periphery of Canadian political, economic and cultural agendas. Canada’s place as a circumpolar nation extending to three, not just two, “shining seas” is not often remembered. The race to establish Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic under international law has largely lain in the hands of ambitious Arctic explorers and polar “experts”, cartographers, scientific “researchers” and government officials following in the trail of missionaries, Hudson’s Bay employees and the RCMP. But this apparent marginality hides the Arctic’s real centrality in the development of Canada as a nation and as a state in international law.

But any belief in this environment as having ever been static is also a mistake. The circumpolar region has seen a constant movement and flux of land, sea, wildlife and peoples for thousands of years. The apparently rigid expanses of ice, rock and barren land is much more complex, alive and mobile then might first appear. There were people here long before the present-day Inuit. There has even been a European presence in the Eastern Arctic for more than a thousand years. Indigenous peoples related to Inuit inhabit the American, European and Asian sides of the Polar region. To the peoples who are native to the North the Arctic is not a barren wasteland of snow and ice but a home of abundance and great beauty. Questions of sovereignty and national boundaries seem more artificial here than anywhere else on earth – and are also more intensely guarded.

In the years following the Second World War the settlement and rapid colonization of the Arctic continued with the establishment of DEW Line (“Distant Early Warning”) posts across the Arctic. Iqaluit, the new capital of Nunavut, was settled as the town of Frobisher Bay because of this military presence. Canada continued to struggle with issues of sovereignty as the Americans began aggressively moving into the area from their Cold War base in Thule, Greenland to the Beaufort Sea in the Western Arctic. Nuclear powered submarines (both American and Soviet) were believed to be lurking through the Northwest Passage, intercontinental ballistic missiles were aimed in all directions over the Pole and extensive oil and gas, mining and fishing development meant that the Arctic was no longer perceived by national governments as the vast empty wilderness on the edge of the world that it had once been. Today, a “Star Wars” type establishment of a missile defense shield, involving Arctic airspace and surveillance, has put Canada back on the frontier of potential hostilities. The Northwest Passage, from being a northern mirage of grandiose ambitions and insane failure, is again being resurrected as a source of ambitious development and potential conflict in international law. Much of the Passage is still inaccessible for most of the year, but this may change.

Beneath the cartographic and legal debate over sovereignty in the Arctic lies a much richer and more complex mosaic of history that needs to be told. Much of this history is pervaded by deception, secrecy, ignorance and loss. There is a natural phenomenon in the North similar to a desert mirage called the “Fatima Morgana” – a refraction of light that often makes distant objects loom into view or small icebergs rear up like skyscrapers. Ships can seem to float in the air or disappear without a trace. Nothing is as it seems. Even when the light is not playing tricks the most barren landscape can hide small miracles of persistent flowering beauty. Traveling to the floe-edge on the spring ice means moving and standing above an oceanic world of animals and plants as rich as any tropical coral reef. For the adventurous traveler or searcher for wilderness beauty the Arctic is a place where beluga whales sing like canaries and birds called thick-billed murres dive into the sea depths as easily as tiny whales. For most people living in “the South” the Arctic is an exotic space on the edge of our maps of the modern world. For Canadians of European descent, both English and French, the conquest and control of a vast hinterland has determined who we are as a culture and a people – as a nation. This in turn fuels the Canadian government’s desire to establish secure claims of legal sovereignty over the Arctic up to and including the North Pole. For the Inuit this land is their home.

Friday, November 25, 2005

Most of the images below were taken while I was travelling with Adventure Canada on one of their Arctic cruises. Below the map of Nunavut the pictures are, in order:
  • Beechey Island (Devon Island - August 2005)
  • Polar Bear on Pack ice in Smith Sound (between Ellesmere Island and Northern Greenland - August 2005)
  • Ice and Ship in Grise Fiord (Ellesmere Island - August 2005)
  • RCMP Post at Dundas Harbour (Devon Island - August 2005)
  • Flag and Ice in Grise Fiord again (August 2005)
  • The Beach in Pond Inlet, Baffin Island (picture taken at midnight June 21, 2003)
  • Pauna or Dwarf Fireweed (also called River Beauty) on Marble Island (Hudson Bay near Rankin Inlet - July 2003)
  • Dogsledding on Frobisher Bay (Iqaluit - February 2003)
  • Eider Ducklings on Marble Island again (July 2003)
  • Arctic Cotton on the way to Apex on Frobisher Bay (July 2003)
  • Graves of RCMP constables, Dundas Harbour (August 2004)